baas.com · Market Intelligence · Live
The BaaS Index
Live intelligence on the BaaS ecosystem — regulatory sentiment, deal velocity, market structure, and cycle position. Live metrics update with every pipeline run. Editorial layer updated quarterly.
Consolidation. Q1 2026 recorded 41 deals, the lowest quarterly volume since Q2 2023 (42 deals) and a 18% decline from Q4 2025's 50 deals, confirming sustained contraction in commercial activity. Simultaneously, enforcement actions continued to accumulate — the registry now tracks 70 active orders with an average resolution time of 28 months — while 14 entities (7% of the registry) sit inactive, including multiple former BaaS sponsor banks that completed wind-downs. The market is firmly in consolidation: surviving players are absorbing regulatory costs and tightening operations, but deal flow has not yet shown signs of a recovery inflection.
| Institution | Regulator | Issued | Active | Sev. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Brazil · Extrajudicial Liquidation | Banco Central do Brasil | Aug 2026 | 0mo | critical |
Fine | FinCEN | Aug 2026 | 0mo | critical |
Fine | FinCEN | Aug 2026 | 1mo | critical |
New York, New York · Civil Money Penalty | FinCEN | Aug 2026 | 1mo | critical |
Consent Order | FinCEN | Aug 2026 | 1mo | critical |
Civil Money Penalty | FinCEN | Aug 2026 | 1mo | critical |
New Delhi, India · Licence Cancellation / Court-Ordered Winding Up | RBI | Jul 2026 | 1mo | critical |
Greece · Suspension of Authorization | Bank of Greece | Jul 2026 | 1mo | critical |
Noida, India · Licence Revocation | RBI | Apr 2026 | 4mo | critical |
Memphis, Tennessee · Civil Penalty Fund Allocation | CFPB | Dec 2025 | 8mo | critical |
Regional reading. The US remains the most heavily tracked market at 76 entities (100% index weight), but deal flow contraction and the CFPB's operational pause have created a supervisory gap that state regulators like NYDFS and California DFPI are only partially filling.
Reading. Dedicated BaaS Providers now constitute 39% of tracked entities, up 5 percentage points from 2024, as traditional banks exit sponsorship roles — Blue Ridge Bank, Metropolitan Commercial Bank, Five Star Bank, and Lewis & Clark Bank all moved to inactive or wind-down status. The simultaneous decline of the hybrid BaaS Provider / Bank model (from 8% to 6%) and Open Banking platforms (from 14% to 11%) suggests the market is bifurcating into specialized infrastructure providers on one side and regulated banks that strictly limit third-party exposure on the other.
| Entity type | 2022 | 2024 | 2026 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bank | 31% | 31% | 31% | ↑ |
| BaaS Provider | 35% | 34% | 39% | ↑ |
| BaaS Provider / Bank | 7% | 8% | 6% | ↓ |
| BaaS Provider / EMI | 10% | 10% | 12% | ↑ |
| Open Banking | 15% | 14% | 11% | ↓ |
Structural, not cyclical. Dedicated BaaS Providers now constitute 39% of tracked entities, up 5 percentage points from 2024, as traditional banks exit sponsorship roles — Blue Ridge Bank, Metropolitan Commercial Bank, Five Star Bank, and Lewis & Clark Bank all moved to inactive or wind-down status. The simultaneous decline of the hybrid BaaS Provider / Bank model (from 8% to 6%) and Open Banking platforms (from 14% to 11%) suggests the market is bifurcating into specialized infrastructure providers on one side and regulated banks that strictly limit third-party exposure on the other.
Every collapse, wind-down, acquisition, and near-failure. 7% of entities that entered the BaaS market are now inactive. Entries are never removed.
The February 2025 stop-work order effectively froze CFPB enforcement and rulemaking. With no indication of restored capacity in the data, bank-fintech arrangements that previously fell under CFPB oversight — including earned wage access, deposit account practices, and remittance compliance — may operate in a supervisory gap. State regulators like NYDFS are stepping up, but their jurisdiction is geographically limited.
The FCA's PS25/12 policy statement, published in Q3 2025, mandates strengthened safeguarding requirements for authorized payment institutions and e-money institutions by May 7, 2026. UK-based BaaS providers and EMIs will need to demonstrate compliance in the coming quarter, potentially driving capital raises, operational restructuring, or market exits among undercapitalized players.
The Tenth Circuit's Q4 2025 ruling applying Colorado usury limits to out-of-state bank loans, combined with the California DFPI's ongoing OppFi/FinWise true lender case (where a February 2026 summary judgment reportedly favored OppFi), signals that the legal framework for bank-fintech lending partnerships remains deeply unsettled. Outcomes in these cases will directly determine the viability of interest rate exportation models used by major BaaS lending programs.
Q1 2026 recorded no M&A transactions — a first in the dataset — despite multiple distressed assets on the market (Solid's confirmed liquidation, Grasshopper Bank's pending acquisition by Enova). The complete absence of M&A suggests either buyer-seller valuation gaps have widened or regulatory uncertainty is freezing acquisition due diligence. If deal flow does not recover in Q2 2026, further wind-downs of unacquired BaaS entities become likely.
Live metrics derived from the baas.com registry (199 tracked entities), regulatory tracker, and deal feed. Updated every pipeline run. Editorial layer — cycle position, "what changed," composition analysis, forward signals, sentiment summary — updated quarterly. Enforcement counts reflect orders explicitly related to BaaS or fintech partnerships. Severity ratings are editorial assessments and do not reflect any official regulatory classification. Full disclaimer →
baas.com · Operated by Staq Technologies (DIFC) Ltd.
Editorial content produced independently of Staq's commercial activities.